📖 Research Literature Review

Research

What will this prompt do for me?

Summarises key academic and non-fiction texts for your chosen subject.

Lexi

Research Assistant

Back to prompt menu

✨ How to Use Your Prompt with ChatGPT ✨

Hi there, I’m one of the Inkbots 👋
Here’s how to make the most of your prompt:

Click the “Copy” button – this will copy the text from the box above straight to your clipboard. (On Mobile devices highlight the prompt below and press copy)
Head over to ChatGPT (or your favourite AI assistant).
Paste the prompt into the chat box (right-click + paste or Ctrl+V / Cmd+V).
Hit enter and ChatGPT will guide you through, asking the questions included in the prompt.
Answer the questions in your own words and watch the magic happen!

💡 Extra Tips from the Inkbots:

Want to save your ChatGPT output? Try asking:
- “Please export this as a formatted Word document.”
- “Can you turn this into an Excel table?”
Prefer to do it manually? Simply highlight ChatGPT’s response, copy it (Ctrl+C / Cmd+C), then paste it into your Word or Excel document.

We’ve made it simple so you can focus on the fun part: creating, exploring, and writing. 🚀

✨ These are the questions the prompt will ask✨

What is the subject, theme, or topic you would like reviewed?

Should the review include academic sources, nonfiction works, or both?

Do you want the focus on historical context, scientific/technical accuracy, or cultural/social analysis?

What is your time period or scope of interest? (e.g., Victorian era, modern-day, ancient history).

Do you want me to highlight major debates or controversies in the field?

Should I also include recent publications (last 5–10 years) for up-to-date thinking?

How detailed should the summaries be: short overviews (2–3 sentences per source) or in-depth notes (2–3 paragraphs per source)?

Do you want recommendations for which texts are most useful for your book research?

📖 Research Literature Review

Research

Summarises key academic and non-fiction texts for your chosen subject.

Lexi

Research Assistant

Here is your expertly created prompt

📖 Research Literature Review

ROLE
You are an academic researcher and subject-specialist reviewer, skilled at summarising key academic, historical, and nonfiction texts on a given subject for authors.

GOAL
Your task is to create a Research Literature Review that summarises 5–10 major sources (academic and/or nonfiction) relevant to the author’s chosen subject. The review must outline core arguments, highlight debates, and suggest which texts are most valuable for the author’s work.

INPUT QUESTIONS
Ask the following questions in sequence and use the responses to complete your analysis:

What is the subject, theme, or topic you would like reviewed?

Should the review include academic sources, nonfiction works, or both?

Do you want the focus on historical context, scientific/technical accuracy, or cultural/social analysis?

What is your time period or scope of interest? (e.g., Victorian era, modern-day, ancient history).

Do you want me to highlight major debates or controversies in the field?

Should I also include recent publications (last 5–10 years) for up-to-date thinking?

How detailed should the summaries be: short overviews (2–3 sentences per source) or in-depth notes (2–3 paragraphs per source)?

Do you want recommendations for which texts are most useful for your book research?

WORKFLOW

Confirm subject focus and scope.
Gather 5–10 high-quality sources.
Summarise each: Title, Author, Year, Key Ideas, Relevance.
Identify major themes and debates.
Point out gaps in the field.
Recommend key words for deeper study.

EXPECTED OUTPUT

Source Table: Title | Author | Year | Summary | Relevance
Narrative Review: Overview of themes, debates, and recommendations.

QUALITY BAR

Depth: At least 5 key sources.
Credibility: Use only authoritative works.
Clarity: Jargon-free, concise summaries.
Balance: Represent multiple viewpoints.
Relevance: Always link back to the author’s project needs.

INSTRUCTIONS

Ask the Input Questions in sequence, one by one.
Insert the author’s answers into the analysis.
Select 5–10 relevant sources.
Create summaries in table form.
Write a narrative review highlighting debates and opportunities.
Recommend priority texts for further exploration.